Does spending more money translate to earning more points in Major League Soccer?
| Rank | Team | Points | Payroll | PPM (Core) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Philadelphia Union | 66 | $13,365,549 | 4.94 |
| 2 | Minnesota United | 58 | $13,804,472 | 4.20 |
| 3 | Vancouver Whitecaps | 63 | $15,809,224 | 3.99 |
| 4 | New York City FC | 56 | $14,963,973 | 3.74 |
| 5 | Charlotte FC | 59 | $17,133,985 | 3.44 |
| 6 | Columbus Crew | 54 | $16,355,869 | 3.30 |
| 7 | Orlando City | 53 | $16,440,785 | 3.22 |
| 8 | San Diego FC | 63 | $20,033,029 | 3.14 |
| 9 | Austin FC | 47 | $15,331,947 | 3.07 |
| 10 | Real Salt Lake | 41 | $13,413,886 | 3.06 |
Philadelphia Union had the best PPM at 4.94, which means they got the most points out of every million dollars they spent. The rest of the teams are pretty close together, which shows that spending more does not automatically mean earning more points.
Philadelphia had a low payroll and still earned the most points. San Diego FC spent the most money of any team but only finished in the middle of the pack. This chart makes it easy to see which teams got good value and which ones did not.
This chart shows that there is no clear pattern between payroll and points. San Diego spent $20 million and got 63 points, while Vancouver spent about $5 million less and got the same result. Higher spending does not mean more points.